Want to receive my work as I publish it?

LAB NOTES
LAB NOTES
LN 020
01•09•2022

These Lab Notes document my research in progress. My research area is in the future of personal computing.

TOC Previous Next Latest


LN 040

The venerable hyperlink

LN 039

Notes on time

LN 038

Semantic zoom

LN 037

Gestural view construction

LN 036

Free and easy organizations and associations

LN 035

The Messy Desktop

LN 034

Live items & Contextual notifications

LN 033

Swappable reference views

LN 032

System injections

LN 031

Fluid workspaces

LN 030

Foldable views

LN 029

Experimenting with the item as the core primitive

LN 028

Designing systems for computer literacy and evolvability

LN 027

Personal Computing Network & Devices

LN 026

Internet Modules

LN 025

Publishing items

LN 024

Mutations & Item change logs

LN 023

Higher-level primitives

LN 022

Undo Actions

LN 021

Automations

LN 020

Item Actions

LN 019

Notifications

LN 018

Services & Item Drives

LN 017

Today & Daily summary

LN 016

Calendar views

EXPERIMENT 001

Cross-reference Navigation in Obsidian

LN 015

Cross-references & References cloud

LN 014

The Graph OS

LN 013

Why is our thinking on computers so restrained?

LN 012

References box & Topics

LN 011

General purpose personal computing software

LN 010

User-created application and system views

LN 009

User-created item views

LN 008

Unified views

LN 007

Atomized apps

LN 006

Swappable views

LN 005

Associated items

LN 004

Browsing contexts & recent paths

LN 003

Universal reference containers

LN 002

Universal data portability

LN 001

Composing application interfaces

LN 000

The Lab Notes

Item Actions

In LN 018, we explored how the OS of the future can have services which bring additional items into our system — things like emails, podcast episodes, calendar event invites, and so forth. We can use these items as freely as the ones we create ourselves, as seen in many of the earlier Lab Notes (e.g. LN 002, LN 004, LN 015).

Services that provide items to our system may also provide actions that can be taken on items of a specific type. For example, a service that brings calendar event invite items into our system may provide an action to RSVP.

So far in these Lab Notes, we’ve seen how the separation of the services which bring items into our system from the views we use to render and interact with those items has allowed us tremendous flexibility in creating the personal computing environments that best suit our lives and life’s work. Items become the fundamental unit with which we can more flexibly do our personal computing.

Similarly, actions are provided as-is by the system and services, and can be used any way we see fit. For example, views can render more than just item data; they can also take advantage of the actions related to an item being rendered.

In fact, when services make actions available along with items, we can make use of the functionality provided by a service through any means of interaction we would like (including many that the service vendor may never have thought to support — via new technologies, assistive devices, and so forth).


At the most basic, it’s straightforward to imagine menus that make actions available for a selected item. These menus could be customized by the user, who can prioritize favorite actions or customize specific actions (such as setting commonly-used parameters in advance). Alternatively, the system could automatically customize this menu, prioritizing frequently-used actions.

Extending into further use cases:

A command palette, seen increasingly in applications today, could allow use of the keyboard to quickly drill down to desired actions.

Users could assign hotkeys to specific actions.

Programmable devices (e.g. Stream Deck) could make use of favorite actions.


Extending into more advanced uses:

Using actions in new kinds of environments or with new technologies would not require new development from the service vendor. This is a compelling deviation from the way software is often built today, which would require each vendor to adopt support for a new class of device.

Users could set up automations that make use of available actions. For example, the arrival of a new email could trigger an automation that checks if it is from a specific sender, and if so, it could take some specific action on the email server in response (more on this in the next lab note).

Creating a shortcut that runs multiple actions would be simple as well. For example, you could add a button to your email item view that both (1) attempts to unsubscribe and (2) archives the email. Users would be able to add such buttons themselves, as seen in LN 009.

Users could choose favorite actions to appear on notifictions. For example, you could add “archive” and “remind in 1 day” buttons to notifications about new, important emails (see more on notifications in LN 019).

And of course there are system-level item actions that can be used in these same controls too: things like adding references (LN 012), opening associated items (LN 005), switching views (LN 006), assigning dates (LN 016), or opening a new browsing path (LN 004).

Something spark a thought? Email me, or come chat on Mastodon or on Twitter.


« Previous: LN 019

TOC

Next: LN 021 »


Want to receive my work as I publish it?